Richard Sears
Primary
Signed by Governor on April 11, 2018
Delivered to Governor on April 6, 2018
Senate Message, House proposal of amendment concurred in
New Business/House Proposal of Amendment
Senator(s) Sears motion to substitute proposal of amendment; text
Senator Rodgers moved to concur in House proposal of amendment with proposal of amendment; text
House proposal of amendment; text
As passed by Senate and House
Senator Sears explained vote
Roll Call, requested by Senator Collamore, Passed -- Needed 16 of 30 to Pass -- Yeas = 17, Nays = 13
House proposal of amendment concurred in
Senator Brock explained vote
Roll Call, requested by Senator Sears, Failed -- Needed 16 of 30 to Pass -- Yeas = 12, Nays = 18
Proposal of amendment not agreed to
Roll Call, requested by Senator Brock, Passed -- Needed 16 of 30 to Pass -- Yeas = 30, Nays = 0
Motion by Senator(s) Sears to substitute a proposal of amendment for that of Senator Rodgers agreed to
Entered on Notice Calendar
House Proposal of Amendment
House message House passed bill in concurrence with proposal(s) of amendment
Which was agreed to
Rep. Dickinson of St. Albans Town and Parent of St. Albans Town moved to amend the House proposal of amendment.
Roll Call Results Passed -- Needed 73 of 144 to Pass -- Yeas = 123, Nays = 21
Which was agreed to
Rep. Brennan of Colchester moved to amend the House proposal of amendment.
Which was disagreed to
Rep. Lalonde of South Burlington moved to amend the House proposal of amendment.
Which was agreed to
Rep. Morris of Bennington moved to amend the House proposal of amendment.
Which was agreed to
Rep. Lalonde of South Burlington moved to amend the House proposal of amendment.
Amendment of Rep. Brennan of Colchester ruled not germane
Rep. Brennan of Colchester moved to amend the House proposal of amendment.
Which was agreed to
Rep. Wright of Burlington moved to amend the House proposal of amendment.
Which was agreed to
Rep. Kimbell of Woodstock moved to amend the House proposal of amendment.
Rep. Bartholomew of Hartland raised a Point of Order
Passed in concurrence with proposal of amendment
Roll Call Results Passed -- Needed 72 of 143 to Pass -- Yeas = 89, Nays = 54
Read Third time
Rep. Donahue of Northfield, Grad of Moretown, and Lalonde of South Burlington moved to amend the House proposal of amendment which was agreed to
Which was agreed to
Rep. Donahue of Northfield asked and was granted leave to withdraw amendment
Rep. Donahue of Northfield moved to amend the House proposal of amendment.
Amendment of Rep. Poirier of Barre City as substituted disagreed to
Roll Call Results Failed -- Needed 73 of 144 to Pass -- Yeas = 47, Nays = 97
Rep. Poirier of Barre City moved to substitute an amendment which was agreed to
Rep. Poirier of Barre City moved to amend the House proposal of amendment.
Rep. Donahue of Northfield moved to amend the House proposal of amendment.
Which was agreed to
Rep. Lalonde of South Burlington moved to amend the House proposal of amendment.
Which was agreed to
Rep. Hebert of Vernon moved to amend the House proposal of amendment.
Which was agreed to
Rep. Lalonde of South Burlington moved to amend the House proposal of amendment.
Rep. Sibilia of Dover moved to amend the report of the committee on Judiciary, which was agreed to.
Read Second Time
Rep. Lalonde of South Burlington reported for the committee on Judiciary
Rep. Poirier of Barre City moved to postpone action until April 10, 2018
Roll Call Results Failed -- Needed 74 of 146 to Pass -- Yeas = 61, Nays = 85
Which was disagreed to
Rep. Higley of Lowell and Buckholz of Hartford moved to amend the report of the committee on Judiciary
Rep. Buckholz of Hartford and Higley of Lowell asked and was granted leave to withdraw amendment
Rep. Bancroft of Westford moved to amend the report of the committee on Judiciary
Roll Call Results Failed -- Needed 74 of 146 to Pass -- Yeas = 57, Nays = 89
Which was disagreed to
Rep. McFaun of Barre Town and Poirier of Barre City moved to amend the report of the committee on Judiciary
Rep. McFaun of Barre Town asked and was granted leave to withdraw amendment
Rep. Donahue of Northfield asked that the question be divided
Roll Call Results Passed -- Needed 72 of 143 to Pass -- Yeas = 141, Nays = 2
First Instance of amendment agreed to
Roll Call Results Passed -- Needed 73 of 144 to Pass -- Yeas = 119, Nays = 25
Second instance of amendment agreed to
Roll Call Results Passed -- Needed 73 of 144 to Pass -- Yeas = 83, Nays = 61
Third instance of amendment agreed to
Roll Call Results Passed -- Needed 73 of 145 to Pass -- Yeas = 79, Nays = 66
Fourth instance of amendment agreed to
Roll Call Results Passed -- Needed 73 of 144 to Pass -- Yeas = 88, Nays = 56
Fifth instance of amendment agreed to.
Rep. Harrison of Chittenden moved to amend the report of the committee on Judiciary
Which was disagreed to
Sixth instance of amendment agreed to
Report of Committee on Judiciary as amended agreed to
Roll Call Results Passed -- Needed 73 of 144 to Pass -- Yeas = 85, Nays = 59
Third Reading Ordered
Read First Time and Referred to the Committee on Judiciary
Rules suspended & messaged to House forthwith, on motion of Senator Ashe
Read 3rd time & passed on roll call, requested by Senator Westman, Passed -- Needed 16 of 30 to Pass -- Yeas = 17, Nays = 13
Division of the Senate YEAS 6, NAYS 24
Recommendation of amendment disagreed to
Pending third reading, Senator(s) Bray moved to amend bill
Recommendation of amendment agreed to
Pending third reading, Senator(s) Sears and Flory moved to amend bill
Senator Benning explained vote
Recommendation of amendment agreed to on roll call, requested by Senator Clarkson, Passed -- Needed 16 of 30 to Pass -- Yeas = 21, Nays = 9
Pending third reading, Senator(s) Ashe, Balint, Ayer, Baruth, Bray, Brooks, Campion, Clarkson, Cummings, Ingram, Lyons, McCormack, Pearson, Pollina, Sirotkin, and White moved to amend bill
Recommendation of amendment disagreed to
Pending third reading, Senator(s) Rodgers moved to amend bill
Recommendation of amendment agreed to
Pending third reading, Senator(s) Rodgers moved to amend bill
Recommendation of amendment disagreed to
Pending third reading, Senator(s) Rodgers moved to amend bill
Recommendation of amendment disagreed to
Pending third reading, Senator(s) Rodgers moved to amend bill
Recommendation of amendment disagreed to
Pending third reading, Senator(s) Bray moved to amend bill
Pending third reading, motion to amend to be offered by Senator(s) Ashe, Balint, Ayer, Baruth, Bray, Brooks, Campion, Clarkson, Cummings, Ingram, Lyons, McCormack, Pearson, Pollina, Sirotkin, and White
Pending third reading, motion to amend to be offered by Senator(s) Rodgers
New Business/Third Reading
Pending third reading, motion to amend to be offered by Senator(s) Bray
Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee on Judiciary
3rd reading ordered
Recommendation of amendment agreed to on roll call, requested by Senator Baruth, Passed -- Needed 16 of 30 to Pass -- Yeas = 17, Nays = 13
Point of order on ground of lack of germaneness raised by Senator Rodgers overruled
Point of order raised by Senator Rodgers on ground that proposed amendment was not germane
Recommendation of amendment by Senator(s) Baruth, Sirotkin, Clarkson, Ingram, Lyons, McCormack, Pearson, Ashe, Ayer, Balint, and Brooks, text
Recommendation of amendment by Committee on Judiciary agreed to
Read second time, reported favorably with recommendation of amendment by Senator Sears for Committee on Judiciary
Recommendation of amendment to be offered by Senator(s) Baruth, Sirotkin, Clarkson, Ingram, Lyons, McCormack, Pearson, Ashe, Ayer, Balint, and Brooks
New Business/Second Reading
Entered on Notice Calendar
Recommendation of amendment to be offered by Senator(s) Baruth, Sirotkin, Clarkson, Ingram, Lyons, McCormack, Pearson, Ashe, Ayer, Balint, and Brooks
Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee onJudiciary
Read 1st time & referred to Committee on Judiciary
| Bill Text Versions | Format |
|---|---|
| As Enacted | |
| Unofficial | PDF PDF |
| Official | PDF PDF PDF |
| As Introduced |
| Document | Format |
|---|---|
| No related documents. |
Data on Open States is updated periodically throughout the day from the official website of the Vermont General Assembly.
If you notice any inconsistencies with these official sources, feel free to file an issue.